Does this ruling still hold?

Search more than 220,000 U.S. Customs rulings and trace how legal authority changes across time.

Examples

An investigation workspace — not a search engine

Three-pane layout for ruling research, authority comparison, and temporal legal reasoning.

Every recommendation must be supportable

Confidence is not enough. Evidence must be inspectable.

47 Matched Authorities
6 Supporting Rulings
2 Contradictory Authorities
3 HTS Notes
1 Chapter Notes

Why this conclusion?

  • + Strong precedent agreement
  • + Consistent HTS lineage
  • Conflicting authority detected

Built on one of the largest customs authority corpora ever assembled

Capability metrics — not vanity statistics.

  • 220,000+ Customs Rulings
  • Complete Historical HTS Corpus
  • Temporal LegalSnapshot Reconstruction
  • Authority Graph
  • Citation Trace Engine
  • Research Package Generation

1,006,874 governed corpus objects · SHA-256 release integrity · deterministic retrieval core

Research should end with a package, not a chat transcript

Exportable research packages with provenance, payload hash, and role-specific views — built for compliance files and matter records.

Research Package · RP-DEMO-HQ088500
  • Question
  • Authorities Used
  • Contradictions
  • LegalSnapshot
  • Supporting Citations
  • Audit Hash
Export formats PDFMarkdownJSON

payload_hash: c5a8d80f… · 8/8 export harness PASS

Purpose-built legal reasoning — not another AI wrapper

Capability Taridex Traditional Search Generic AI
Can it determine whether a ruling still holds today? YES NO NO
Can it reconstruct historical HTS context? YES NO NO
Can it produce an auditable research package? YES NO PARTIAL

Factual comparison. Traditional search = CROSS / ruling lookup. Generic AI = horizontal legal chat.

Westlaw for customs and trade law

Governed decision support for brokers, trade counsel, and compliance teams — built on evidence, provenance, and inspectable legal reasoning.

Security & data handling · Methodology · Demo environment certified